koko体育app

欢迎来到《koko体育app 学报(医学版)》
杨梦宇, 高芸艺, 李艳等. 人胰岛素放射免疫分析试剂盒测定小型猪胰岛素的可行性研究[J]. koko体育app 学报(医学版), 2017, 48(3): 418-421.
引用本文: 杨梦宇, 高芸艺, 李艳等. 人胰岛素放射线免疫系统解析免疫试剂盒检验大中型猪胰岛素的可实施性科研[J]. 陕西一本大学学报(医学研究版), 2017, 48(3): 418-421.
YANG Meng-yu, GAO Yun-yi, LI Yan. et al. A Study on the Feasibility to Assay Minipig Insulin Through Human Insulin Radioimmunoassay Kit[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2017, 48(3): 418-421.
Citation: YANG Meng-yu, GAO Yun-yi, LI Yan. et al. A Study on the Feasibility to Assay Minipig Insulin Through Human Insulin Radioimmunoassay Kit[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2017, 48(3): 418-421.

人胰岛素放射免疫分析试剂盒测定小型猪胰岛素的可行性研究

A Study on the Feasibility to Assay Minipig Insulin Through Human Insulin Radioimmunoassay Kit

  • 摘要: 目的探讨人特异的胰岛素放射免疫分析试剂盒(Ins-RIA)检测小型猪血清胰岛素水平的可行性。方法采集219份巴马小型猪血清标本,分别采用人 Ins-RIA和猪特异的胰岛素ELISA试剂盒(Ins-ELISA)测定血清胰岛素水平。分析两种方法检测猪胰岛素水平的相关性,随机抽取80%(175份)的数据进行直线回归分析,以Ins-ELISA为因变量,Ins-RIA为自变量,建立回归方程,再用剩余20% (44份) 的数据对回归方程进行回代验证。结果在巴马小型猪,猪Ins-ELISA检测值低于人Ins-RIA检测值,分别为(15.32±15.50) μIU/mL及(32.31±21.74) μIU/mL,差异有统计学意义(PR2 =0.94);在回代验证中,Ins-ELISA的预测值和实际检测值之间的平均差异为17.18%,预测值与实际测量值之间的吻合程度较好(P>0.05)。结论巴马小型猪ELISA法检测的血清胰岛素水平可以用人胰岛素RIA法检测的血清胰岛素水平来进行估计。  
    Abstract: Objective To investigate the feasibility of using human-specific insulin radioimmunoassay (Ins-RIA) kit to measure the concentrations of serum insulin in minipigs. Methods The Serum samples (219) of Bama minipigs were collected. The concentrations of serum insulin in Bama minipigs were measured by Ins-RIA kit and porcine-specific insulin enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Ins-ELISA) kit, respectively. The linear regression analysis was undertaken in a randomly selected 175 samples (80% of total samples) to establish predictive equations between the concentrations of serum insulin measured by Ins-ELISA and the concentrations of serum insulin measured by Ins-RIA. The equations were then cross-validated in the remaining 44 samples (20% of total samples) that had not been included in the regression analysis. Results Measured insulin concentration was lower with the Ins-ELISA than that with the Ins-RIA 〔(15.32±15.50) μIU/mL vs. (32.31±21.74) μIU/mL, respectively, Pr2=0.94). The differences between the predicted values and the actual measured values were 17.18%. Conclusion Insulin values in Bama minipigs obtained from the Ins-ELISA and Ins-RIA are not equivalent and differ significantly. However, the insulin concentration by Ins-ELISA can be well estimated by Ins-RIA.  
© 2017 《koko体育app 学报(医学版)》编辑部 版权所有 cc

开放获取😼 本文遵循知识共享署名—非商业性使用4.0国际许可协议(CC BY-NC 4.0),允许第三方对本刊发表的论文自由共享(即在任何媒介以任何形式复制、发行原文)、演绎(即修改、转换或以原文为基础进行创作),必须给出适当的署名,提供指向本文许可协议的链接,同时标明是否对原文作了修改;不得将本文用于商业目的。CC BY-NC 4.0许可协议详情请访问

/

返回文章
返回
var _hmt = _hmt || []; (function() { var hm = document.createElement("script"); hm.src = "https://hm.baidu.com/hm.js?90c4d9819bca8c9bf01e7898dd269864"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(hm, s); })(); !function(p){"use strict";!function(t){var s=window,e=document,i=p,c="".concat("https:"===e.location.protocol?"https://":"http://","sdk.51.la/js-sdk-pro.min.js"),n=e.createElement("script"),r=e.getElementsByTagName("script")[0];n.type="text/javascript",n.setAttribute("charset","UTF-8"),n.async=!0,n.src=c,n.id="LA_COLLECT",i.d=n;var o=function(){s.LA.ids.push(i)};s.LA?s.LA.ids&&o():(s.LA=p,s.LA.ids=[],o()),r.parentNode.insertBefore(n,r)}()}({id:"K9y7iMpaU8NS42Fm",ck:"K9y7iMpaU8NS42Fm"}); koko体育-koko体育app koko体育-koko体育网页版koko体育app koko体育-全站app下载(官网) m6米乐app|下载 m6米乐app|主頁欢迎您!!